Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of awards and honors bestowed upon Imelda Marcos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Imelda Marcos. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

List of awards and honors bestowed upon Imelda Marcos

List of awards and honors bestowed upon Imelda Marcos (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

4 not very notable awards do not justify this article which was created by a SPA. Pincrete (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

I think it should be merged rather than deleted. FunkMonk (talk) 14:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Merge to Imelda Marcos per FunkMonk Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

• Merge to Imelda Marcos. The Imelda Marcos article is not so long that this information couldn't fit in there. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:07, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
• Merge to Imelda Marcos, then delete. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 14:30, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
• Merge per all of the above. Montanabw^(talk) 18:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
• Delete and salt. _Muffled ^Pocketed 09:09, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Comment Whilst I have no objection to a merge, I question whether these awards are notable and therefore merge-worthy. At least some appear to have been ritually handed out on state visits or to ambassadors. Pincrete (talk) 09:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

• Merge to Imelda Marcos. Anything which is worth keeping can easily fit in that article. Alsee (talk) 09:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Delete: This content will only clutter the main article and should not be returned there.Imeldific (talk) 10:26, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

nb Imeldific is the article creator

• Delete as there's nothing to suggest there's anything imaginably different for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.