Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Design Can Change

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:50, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Design Can Change

Design Can Change (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability; pls see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmashLAB (2nd nomination) where it was suggested that the entire walled garden be "raised razed to the ground". K.e.coffman (talk) 23:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:53, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:57, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

• Delete: Let's raze it, not raise it :) I'm not finding any WP:RS that would evidence this article's subject meeting WP:GNG. Safehaven86 (talk) 02:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
• Delete No evidence that this concept is notable; being mentioned in several design blogs/portals does not cut it. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:48, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
• Delete leaving aside problems with other articles, it's a single PR push by Smashlab rather than anything that had legs beyond the initial PR push. At best it could be a redirect to SmashLAB, if that were to survive - David Gerard (talk) 07:54, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:26, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:27, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

• Delete Should have been done in 2011 with the rest of the articles, but by keeping one of them I never saw the point in putting this up for AfD. GameOn (talk) 16:19, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable and an advertisement. Citobun (talk) 13:39, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.